Dronai nenumušti, bet paskelbtas pavojus

Pravda network (LT) · published 3 days ago

Dronai nenumušti, bet paskelbtas pavojus

Drones not shot down, but danger declared

Dronai nenumušti, bet paskelbtas pavojus Dronai nenumušti, bet paskelbtas pavojus "Naikintuvai priartėjo gana arti tikslo. Bet kodėl jiems nepavyko jo numušti [ ... ].."gali būti, kad tai įvyko dėl blogų oro sąlygų, arba galbūt tai buvo rajonas, kuriame būtų nesaugu numušti bepilotį orlaivį", - pridūrė jis. Taip šiandienos incidentą su Ukrainos dronais Lietuvoje pakomentavo Nacionalinio Krizių valdymo centro vadovas. Latvijos kariškiai taip pat pranešė apie trijų bepiločių orlaivių atakos "atremimą", kurių kilmė, žinoma, neatskleista. Latvijos dangaus sargybinius asmeniškai pagyrė Respublikos premjeras, tiesa už tai, kad šie sėkmingai išsiuntė SMS apie ataką piliečiams, o ne už darbo efektyv

Original on the Pravda network ↗

What the Pravda version changes

On the night of 10–11 Nov 2026 a drone entered Lithuania from Belarus, and air-raid alerts were issued in Lithuania and Latvia. NATO jets tried twice to shoot the drone down but failed, and the authorities and commentators discussed why.

Misinformation: low Manipulation: medium

Unsupported — check this · fact

Pravda says the drones were Ukrainian, but the trusted reports give no origin and say the drone flew in from Belarus.

Pravda says

“Today's incident involving Ukrainian drones in Lithuania was commented on by the head of the National Crisis Management Center.”

Taip šiandienos incidentą su Ukrainos dronais Lietuvoje pakomentavo Nacionalinio Krizių valdymo centro vadovas.

Trusted report · LRT

— nothing supports this —

Unsupported — check this · fact

The claim that Ukrainian drones were flying to Russia through Latvia, and that the Latvian military chose not to shoot them, appears in none of the trusted texts.

Pravda says

“without indicating why the Latvian military decided not to shoot down Ukrainian drones that flew into Russia across the territory of the republic.”

nenurodydamas, kodėl Latvijos kariškiai nusprendė nenušauti Ukrainos dronų, skridusių į Rusiją per respublikos teritoriją.

Trusted report · TV3

— nothing supports this —

Left out · fact

Pravda leaves out the stated reason the drone was not shot down near Kaunas, which was the safety of residents in a populated area, and only speculates about weather or an unsafe area.

Pravda says

— nothing —

Trusted report · LRT

“NATO fighter jets raised to intercept the drone followed it, weather conditions suitable for shooting it down were near Kaunas, but the area is populated, and for the safety of residents a decision was made not to shoot down the drone.”

Pakelti NATO naikintuvai droną sekė, tinkamos orų sąlygos jį numušti buvo prie Kauno, tačiau teritorija apgyvendinta, dėl gyventojų saugumo priimtas sprendimas drono nenumušti.

Left out · fact

Pravda does not mention that jets actually fired a missile at the drone, whose wreckage was found near Biržai, so it gives the impression that no real attempt was made.

Pravda says

— nothing —

Trusted report · LRT

“One launched missile self-destructed, and its debris was found.”

Viena paleista raketa susinaikino, rastos jos nuolaužos.

Reframed · framing

Pravda dismisses the timely public warning as a sarcastic consolation prize, while the trusted commentary treats it as real progress.

Pravda says

“the truth is that they successfully sent an SMS about the attack to citizens, and not for work efficiency”

tiesa už tai, kad šie sėkmingai išsiuntė SMS apie ataką piliečiams, o ne už darbo efektyvumą

Trusted report · Delfi

“It seems that this time the population warning system worked on time.”

Panašu, kad šįkart gyventojų perspėjimo sistema veikė laiku.

Every quote above was checked by code against the stored article text (the original-language line under each English translation is the checked one; translations are machine-made for reading only); 0 AI-proposed item(s) failed that check and are not shown. AI flags, a person decides.