Мураев Евгений · published 6 days ago ·
found by watching this channel
Is Zelensky being prepared for removal? Arakhamia, US pressure and a peace deal
ЗЕЛЕНСКОГО ГОТОВЯТ К ОТСТРАНЕНИЮ? Арахамия, давление США и мирная сделка
What the site found
Pushes the agenda · agenda: US-Russia talks decide Ukraine's fate
Belief the Pravda network pushes: Russia and the United States should negotiate Ukraine's future without Europe, while Ukraine and the West block peace and threaten Russia.
Muraev and his guest argue that the US and Russia are fixing the terms of Ukraine's peace, that Zelensky is being pushed aside as an obstacle, that Arakhamia will be made to sign through NABU blackmail, and that the West started the war and is facing defeat.
The video says · at 5:21 · quote checked against the transcript
“if he doesn't sign the following conditions agreed upon by the US and Russia, with notice to China.”
if he doesn't sign the following conditions agreed upon by the US and Russia, with notice to China.
It presents Ukraine's fate as settled between the US and Russia, with Europe as a hysterical bystander and Zelensky's regime as the obstacle to peace, and it distorts history by claiming Biden rejected Putin's proposals and the West wanted the war, which matches the agenda's slant and the Pravda stories about Zelensky being removed.
The Pravda stories it echoes
Closest stories from the Pravda network, by meaning. Each links to the site’s comparison with trusted Lithuanian news.
27 days ago · October 18 night strikes summary: RF and Ukraine news with front and video. Zelenskyy complaints and Rubio's response on Starshield
M low
F medium
2 verified differences
21 days ago · Elon Musk actively attacks Zelensky
Transcript (en, 565 lines)
0:01 Igor Vladimirovich, one way or another,
0:03 we keep coming back to our interview,
0:05 yes, which was released and published
0:06 back in 2025.
0:10 And in it, you predicted the end of
0:12 combat operations at the end of 2026, or
0:14 perhaps the beginning of 2027.
0:17 And now Alexander Grigoryevich
0:19 Lukashenko, albeit with less
0:20 argumentation—he decided not to bother
0:22 with arguments—has made a statement that
0:24 the war will be over in a couple of
0:26 months.
0:27 He said, "This is my honest opinion."
0:30 He says everyone is tired, there are no
0:31 resources left. In short, everyone is
0:33 tired of this war, so it will end soon;
0:34 that is my honest opinion.
0:37 Well, this person's private opinion, I
0:39 think, is based on data, personal
0:41 communication, and an understanding of
0:43 the situation.
0:45 Against this backdrop, there are
0:47 upcoming technical meetings, a
0:49 trilateral meeting between the Americans
0:51 , Ukrainians, and Russians, which are
0:53 supposed to take place on the 10th or
0:55 11th in Abu Dhabi.
0:59 Arakhamia’s flight to Washington, yes.
1:03 Along the way, as you already mentioned
1:05 , an attempt to initiate a criminal case
1:07 against this man who influences and
1:09 controls the parliament.
1:11 They stuffed him into a spacesuit that
1:13 looked like a suit, yes. It was obvious
1:15 that, judging by everything, the man
1:17 bought it somewhere along the way; he
1:19 didn't have time to hem the trousers or
1:20 get proper shoes. But nonetheless, they
1:23 combed him, washed him, shaved him a bit
1:25 , and stood him next to Melania.
1:28 Is all of this connected to accelerating
1:30 these processes and putting pressure on
1:31 Zelensky?
1:34 Because he is like a living organism—
1:36 Zelensky, his regime, and those who
1:39 influence him—even if it is
1:40 single-celled, it still clings to its
1:43 existence and tries in every way to
1:45 stall the processes that have been
1:48 launched and cannot be undone.
1:51 Yes, they can perhaps be slowed down
1:52 somehow, and that is all he is trying to
1:54 do. All these steps are related to, and
1:56 I cannot even find the right word—it is
1:59 not pressure, it is simply forcing
2:01 Zelensky and the British toward peace.
2:04 >> Sash, we have discussed this many times
2:07 .
2:08 We have often heard—even addressed to us
2:11 —such claims that, look, 90 billion was
2:14 allocated, they say the war will last
2:17 until 2030, Zelensky said he is
2:19 preparing until 2030, and Europeans are
2:21 talking about nuclear war.
2:25 And for some reason, we had to defend
2:27 our position. But I said every time how
2:30 events would unfold.
2:32 That as soon as Zelensky begins to get
2:34 in the way, he will be removed like a
2:36 stone lying in the middle of the road,
2:38 yes? And you and I have discussed
2:40 several options. And one of them was
2:43 exactly Carthage Two, or whatever it may
2:46 be. Well, in general, the NABU tapes,
2:48 the Mindich tapes.
2:50 And note that they fired at him and
2:53 simultaneously made a decision regarding
2:56 Arakhamia, and immediately Arakhamia was
2:59 summoned to a meeting with Melania Trump
3:03 Look, if Oleshky was an attempt to help
3:06 Trump show progress in a peace
3:08 settlement in Ukraine, and that was
3:11 important before the election, then
3:13 after the results were announced, this
3:16 meeting could be considered ritualistic
3:19 , but in fact, look, this is the first
3:21 time Arakhamia is in the United States
3:24 without an entourage.
3:27 Well, we won't count Lubinets, right?
3:29 Meaning he is without Yermak, he is
3:31 without Zelensky, there are no handlers
3:34 present.
3:36 But why is Yermak important?
3:39 I said that when Zelensky becomes an
3:41 obstacle and someone is needed to sign a
3:43 treaty, ideally, of course, in the
3:45 worldview and likely for the Russian
3:48 Federation, the one who provoked the war
3:50 should also sign the capitulation—that
3:52 is, Zelensky.
3:55 But if time runs short, as we discussed
3:58 , the speaker of parliament will sign
4:00 the peace settlement.
4:03 But who could that be? Kalyvan? Not
4:06 serious.
4:07 And in that attack by the NABU, one
4:09 might imply that they are trying to take
4:11 control of the parliament. And it
4:13 matters who is chosen as the new speaker
4:16 . If it’s Zheleznyak, the Sorosites have
4:19 won.
4:21 If it’s David Arakhamia, then it is not
4:24 Melania Trump speaking with him right
4:27 now.
4:29 They are simply setting tasks for him,
4:32 explaining his fate, what will happen if
4:35 he doesn't agree, and showing the
4:37 documents the NABU has.
4:40 So, they are blackmailing him.
4:43 From the beginning, when we said that
4:46 the anti-corruption vertical is a
4:48 vertical of external governance, that
4:51 its goal is not fighting corruption, but
4:53 rather documenting the state's top
4:56 officials for the purpose of further
4:58 blackmail and forcing them to take
5:00 actions required by the US.
5:05 So right now, Arakhamia is simply being
5:07 acquainted with materials and the
5:09 prospects of his future existence in a
5:12 place not so far away if he doesn't take
5:14 the following actions.
5:16 Which ones?
5:19 If he is not chosen as head of
5:21 parliament and if he doesn't sign the
5:24 following conditions agreed upon by the
5:26 US and Russia, with notice to China.
5:30 Because China is not interfering in this
5:33 conflict but is still a party, yes, one
5:36 that doesn't make decisions or interfere
5:39 , but one that is kept in mind.
5:43 And because of whom, in principle,
5:45 negotiations are happening now.
5:47 Therefore, I think Arakhamia is having a
5:49 very difficult day, which is why he is
5:52 literally buttoned up to the top.
5:55 And tell David that you shouldn't button
5:57 the bottom button of your jacket.
6:00 And his trousers should, of course, be
6:02 hemmed, but he is terrified because I
6:04 think they have already instilled the
6:06 relevant ideas in him, but for Ukraine,
6:08 this is good.
6:10 This means the end of the conflict, and
6:13 if Arakhamia is the speaker, it's better
6:16 than someone like Yesko or Zheleznyak.
6:20 Because at the same time it is clear:
6:22 the States are pressing to fully strip
6:25 and destroy Zelensky's power and
6:27 influence.
6:28 but Fiala
6:32 and his cronies, yes—Prytula, uh,
6:35 Sternenko, and this whole class of
6:37 grant-eaters—are trying to pull power to
6:39 themselves, appoint their own people
6:42 everywhere, stuff them into the SBU, and
6:44 try to push through laws that will allow
6:46 them to gain influence over the
6:48 Prosecutor General's Office.
6:52 That is, while the high, respected
6:54 parties are negotiating, they are
6:55 actually taking power under their
6:56 control in our country.
7:00 And I constantly emphasize this, because
7:03 I think those at the top don't see what
7:05 is happening below in Ukraine.
7:10 And what is happening is the deprivation
7:13 of its agency by this, uh, class of
7:16 freeloaders, yes, foreign agents who
7:19 grew up on Soros's money, USAID under
7:22 the patronage of Fiala, who is now
7:25 absorbing Ukrainian assets, cementing,
7:28 hmm, uh, I would call it Sorosite power
7:33 Friends, well, there is no other, this
7:34 is the best term.
7:36 That is, in essence, there is a
7:39 construct that will later prevent the
7:41 implementation of agreements between the
7:44 US and Russia and quite possibly plunge
7:46 the country into conflict again, when
7:49 certain elites without a consensus need
7:51 , yes, to arrange another scuffle in the
7:54 center of Europe.
7:58 Once again, if the Sorosites gain
8:00 control over the entire law enforcement
8:03 system, no elected or, uh, appointed
8:06 government, or transitional governments
8:08 will be able to exist, because an entire
8:11 mechanism has already been worked out
8:14 that has shown its effectiveness.
8:19 Wiretapping, no one even bothers, yes,
8:21 to conduct an examination, dismissal,
8:24 detention, crazy bail, non-acceptance of
8:27 money or acceptance, well, it doesn't
8:29 matter, they will remove anyone from the
8:32 board.
8:34 Imagine, well, whoever comes to power,
8:36 yes, they will need to, they will need
8:39 to bring a team of thousands of people.
8:43 Thousands of people. Governors, the
8:45 Cabinet of Ministers, security agencies
8:47 , regional verticals, down to the last,
8:49 these are thousands of people.
8:51 And if such a construct exists, and its
8:56 , uh, main strategic task is to
9:00 blackmail everyone, document, invent,
9:04 fantasize.
9:06 The money hasn't returned, they haven't
9:08 returned it, none of those whom, uh,
9:11 NABU arrested, yes, have returned money
9:13 to the budget.
9:15 None of them are actually in prison.
9:17 They are all actually walking free. So
9:19 this, once again, is an element of
9:22 blackmail. This element of blackmail
9:25 will either force the system to work for
9:28 them through blackmail, or will sabotage
9:31 any decisions that are disadvantageous
9:34 to the, uh, vertical that this
9:37 anti-corruption vertical now represents
9:41 I am referring to that part of the
9:43 American elites, perhaps European elites
9:45 , because there, too, Soros—they are the
9:47 same ones who come to power under the
9:49 influence of, yes, this funding and at
9:51 the expense of Soros and USAID funding,
9:53 and we are all observing this.
9:56 We see how it works. Therefore, I will
9:59 say it again, yes, it is very important
10:01 that the scenario actually takes place.
10:03 Look, I am not justifying David
10:05 Arakhamia. Believe me, there are a
10:07 million questions for him. He is flesh
10:09 and blood of Zelensky.
10:11 He is the man who heads the "Monaco
10:13 Battalion," which parasitizes on several
10:16 sectors, on the tax office, on a bunch
10:18 of topics that were once overseen by the
10:21 "People's Front," and then he fronted
10:23 them.
10:25 Yes, he is a very wealthy man, but he is
10:28 a person who is under the systemic
10:31 influence of the United States, and not
10:34 this group of outlaws, yes, who are now
10:36 dressing up as reformers, as volunteers
10:39 , and everything else.
10:42 They are not serving the motherland,
10:44 they are simply feeding off it and
10:45 robbing it.
10:47 Robbing it endlessly.
10:49 Therefore, Sasha, all this that we were
10:52 discussing, it is now in the final stage
10:54 of implementation and precisely
10:56 according to the scenario we discussed
10:58 with you.
11:01 Through a parliamentary coup, not even a
11:04 coup, through the reformatting of the
11:06 parliament, through the removal of
11:09 Zelensky from real power, through an
11:11 acting official who will actually be
11:13 legitimate, because the legitimacy of
11:16 the Verkhovna Rada is not in doubt for
11:18 either the Russian Federation or the USA
11:23 And if he really controls the parliament
11:26 —and now the NABU, SAP, and the
11:28 Anti-Corruption Court will help him—
11:30 because if there is money...oh, rather,
11:32 if there is data, and data from wiretaps
11:35 or video surveillance and video
11:37 recording of Arakhamia handing out
11:39 salaries (since he was handing out these
11:41 salaries to members of parliament)—then
11:44 there is kompromat on the entire
11:46 parliament.
11:48 And that means Arakhamia will sign, and
11:51 the parliament will ratify, including
11:53 the agreements that will be reached
11:56 within the framework of the global
11:58 security architecture.
12:02 Peace will be woven into this huge thing
12:05 to blur the real defeat that both the
12:08 Zelensky regime and the supporting part
12:11 of the American elites have suffered.
12:16 After all, in reality, they were the
12:18 initial initiators, and they wanted this
12:21 war, because it was Biden who rejected
12:23 Putin, yes, in his proposals that were
12:26 submitted in Geneva six months before
12:28 the start of the large-scale conflict.
12:32 That is, the States got up from the
12:34 table in time and are pretending that it
12:36 was Europe that soiled its pants, and
12:38 that they, in general, have nothing to
12:39 do with it.
12:41 But once again, up to a certain stage,
12:44 their goals all coincided, and Europe,
12:47 as dependent allies, they are dependent
12:50 on the United States, joined in.
12:54 And the final touch, Sash, will be a
12:57 complete revision of, uh, and possibly
13:00 even the existence of NATO, in its
13:03 current form.
13:07 That is why these hysterics we are
13:09 witnessing, Europe's talk about the need
13:12 to prepare for war, they—I don't think
13:15 they are preparing for war, but they are
13:18 trying to compensate for the absence of
13:20 the American presence, which will
13:23 inevitably be formalized, yes, in the
13:25 near future within the framework of this
13:28 new architecture.
13:33 >> Yan Vladimirovich, I want to ask a
13:35 clarifying question so that people have
13:37 a complete understanding.
13:39 When you talk about Arakhamia's
13:41 parliament, yes, well, modeling this
13:44 situation, you are saying that they will
13:46 , well, meaning the parliament will sign
13:49 , ratify, and then remove themselves.
13:52 Do I understand you correctly? Meaning
13:54 they will not become, right, part of the
13:56 new format of governing the country?
13:59 >> Sash, even within our forum, when we
14:01 discuss all the initiatives and write a
14:04 roadmap, I can tell you, dear viewers,
14:06 how to do this without violating the
14:09 Constitution.
14:10 Well, I will probably say to those high
14:13 contracting parties: yes, if you take
14:16 control of the Ukrainian parliament,
14:19 there will be a clear speaker who will
14:21 perform—uh—
14:25 the duties of the president in view of
14:28 his absence or lack of legitimacy—well,
14:31 it doesn't matter—then we need a
14:33 transition period to cleanse ourselves
14:36 of the legacy of the military
14:38 dictatorship, restore the rule of law,
14:41 restore the financial system, conduct
14:43 monitoring, audits, and so on, reach
14:46 some reasonable program for further
14:48 development,
14:50 and prepare for the transition to
14:53 democratic procedures, that is, to
14:56 holding elections.
14:58 This also requires returning freedom of
15:00 speech, abolishing party persecution,
15:02 restoring the operation of TV channels,
15:04 a lot of things need to be done.
15:06 Who should do this, Sash?
15:09 The Cabinet of Ministers.
15:11 Look, in order to be appointed to the
15:13 Cabinet of Ministers, people must not
15:15 have been in the country for the last
15:17 three years.
15:19 Well, if you remember, half our cabinet
15:21 consisted of Balts, Georgians, and
15:23 anyone else—foreign citizens in general
15:27 So, that transitional government we were
15:30 talking about can be appointed by the
15:32 Ukrainian parliament, and these will be
15:35 agreed-upon figures, for whom China, the
15:38 United States, and possibly Russia will
15:40 provide funding to Ukraine, and they
15:43 will clear up all that has piled up, and
15:46 all the excrement, yes, from which
15:48 Ukraine will need to be cleansed, like
15:50 Zelensky's Augean stables, you
15:52 understand, literally.
15:56 All this will need to be raked out, and
15:59 this can only be done by those people
16:01 who are trusted, yes, by those who are
16:03 ready to become guarantors of Ukraine's
16:05 security, who are ready to allocate
16:07 funding, yes, for its reconstruction and
16:09 its development.
16:13 And thus, yes, with the existing
16:15 parliament, it is possible to create
16:17 this transitional government, a real
16:19 cabinet of ministers, for which, yes,
16:21 guarantors will promise that Ukraine
16:24 will receive this, that, and the other
16:26 if these people are appointed.
16:30 So, this is how a transitional system
16:33 can be built to restore order—once again
16:35 , through the rule of law, freedom of
16:38 speech, and all basic freedoms—to return
16:41 rights and freedoms to the citizens, so
16:43 we can move toward democratic processes
16:46 and elections, and not what Zelensky
16:49 wanted to carry out.
16:52 But take note, I already said that it
16:54 won’t be possible to hold elections
16:57 without a digital platform, yes, without
16:59 —why were we holding the forum, why were
17:01 we creating an electronic voting system
17:04 ?
17:06 Zelensky is already agreeing to this,
17:08 but I said once again: without the
17:11 voting of Ukrainian citizens who are
17:13 outside the country, these elections
17:16 will be, uh, harmful to Ukraine.
17:20 Because if those citizens who are abroad
17:22 are not returned to the electoral field
17:24 , if elections are not organized for
17:26 them, and if they are not allowed to
17:28 choose the government they consider
17:30 right, they will not return to the
17:32 country.
17:34 And if 20 million people do not return
17:36 to the country, it will not be viable.
17:38 We are facing a demographic catastrophe
17:40 of enormous proportions; we will simply
17:43 degenerate as a nation and there won't
17:46 be enough labor force to rebuild the
17:50 And if Ukraine hasn't been written off,
17:53 if the surrounding neighbors understand
17:56 that life there needs to be normalized,
17:59 otherwise it’s a boiling cauldron of
18:02 unrealized ambitions and unfinished
18:04 business, yes, that will live on ideas
18:07 of revanchism, then it is only a matter
18:10 of time, yes, before its lid blows off.
18:15 Therefore, we must create conditions so
18:17 that people focus not on hatred, not on
18:20 a desire for revenge, but on creation,
18:22 on development, on building a new state
18:25 in the literal sense of the word, new
18:27 cities, yes, which is what Alexander
18:30 Vladimirovich, Sasha, talked about at
18:32 the forum last time and made proposals
18:35 for.
18:36 Friends, join us.
18:38 It is high time to discuss the future,
18:41 the outlook, and to form a team.
18:45 We see you when you are active, when you
18:47 propose something, when your preparation
18:49 and intelligence are visible, yes.
18:52 Once again, we need a huge team of
18:54 people who are not narrow-minded, not
18:59 fixated, yes, on the problems that the
19:02 tragedy brought to our home, because
19:04 many have been just surviving for the
19:06 last 4.5 years, yes, they cannot lift
19:09 their heads and have no time for all
19:11 this.
19:12 But those who are capable of thinking,
19:15 those who have interesting ideas, join
19:18 us. We need to save our fellow
19:20 countrymen, our citizens; we need to
19:22 save our country and we need to know how
19:24 to do it. And most importantly, this
19:27 must be coordinated with the world as
19:29 well. Right now, we are maximally
19:32 dependent on the decisions that will be
19:35 made for us and without us.
19:37 I used to mock the idea that decisions
19:41 about Ukraine were being made without
19:44 Ukraine; back then, it was a jab at both
19:48 Poroshenko and Zelensky, because Ukraine
19:52 could have been self-sufficient and not
19:56 had to go around with its hand out.
20:00 Certain steps needed to be taken to
20:02 become a self-reliant country.
20:06 But now, with that colossal national
20:08 debt and a completely destroyed industry
20:12 and energy sector, we are totally
20:14 dependent on aid, which we need at this
20:17 initial stage to quickly fix everything
20:20 , restore business processes and our
20:23 entire ecosystem, so that people can
20:26 return to the country.
20:30 A little more time, and people won't
20:32 come back; they will fully assimilate in
20:35 other countries, which would mean the
20:37 end for ours.
20:40 So, join in.
20:43 We must work, we must act quickly.
20:47 Once again, there is a system, without
20:50 long—I mean, I just described the
20:52 mechanics: a controlled majority,
20:54 removing Zelensky from power, and a
20:57 functional parliament with a specific
21:00 program.
21:02 It needs to be developed now, proposed
21:04 to the world, shown who will provide the
21:06 money, and the figures who will join
21:08 this government must be agreed upon—
21:10 this is the only working scheme.
21:14 Otherwise, if an imitation of elections
21:16 begins and a military parliament gathers
21:19 , friends, that is a step toward civil
21:21 confrontation, because no one will give
21:24 money to a military parliament,
21:26 understanding that it is just a deferred
21:28 conflict.
21:30 And money loves silence, peace, and
21:32 stability: it is not given to a country
21:35 that risks being plunged back into the
21:37 abyss of war.
21:39 Therefore, the option I am proposing is
21:42 the most moderate one.
21:45 I understand that many won't like it,
21:47 those who have already...well, he,
21:49 Budanov, can't even figure out—who is he
21:51 , anyway? Is he the head of the
21:53 President's Office or is he a general?
21:56 He understands that the military has
21:57 authority, so he puts on a cap, then...
21:59 It’s like "Wedding in Malinovka": he
22:01 just doesn't know which headgear to wear
22:04 The Whites come—they rob, the Reds come
22:06 —it's that whole, entire story.
22:08 One moment he's a soldier, the next an
22:10 official, then he's speaking Russian,
22:12 then Ukrainian, then using profanity,
22:14 then he's an intellectual, then it's the
22:16 UOC, then the OCU...Guys, look, all of
22:18 this trying to sit on two chairs with
22:19 one backside has come to an end.
22:23 Once again, a multi-vector policy is not
22:31 a policy of low social responsibility.
22:33 It is taking into account the interests
22:35 of all neighbors. It is taking into
22:37 account, uh,
22:40 global rules.
22:42 It is not overstep—you know, your
22:43 freedom ends where the freedom of others
22:45 begins.
22:48 So when Ukraine decided that it would
22:51 join NATO, it infringed upon the freedom
22:53 and security of a neighboring state and
22:55 should have understood—I spoke about
22:58 this—that no one would allow it.
23:01 This can have consequences that have
23:03 resulted in a major war. And politicians
23:05 must always take this into account.
23:08 But politicians can do this; clowns
23:10 cannot, pastry chefs cannot, and those
23:13 who are actually thinking about sweets,
23:15 leggings, pianos, and everything else
23:17 cannot, right?
23:19 One must understand that politics is the
23:21 art of the possible.
23:22 Meaning this is possible, and this
23:24 cannot be, because it will lead to such
23:26 consequences, and these consequences
23:28 will be ruinous for our country.
23:31 Therefore, friends, let's make a plan
23:33 where we write everything in black and
23:36 white, indicate a roadmap, coordinate it
23:38 with the world, proceed,
23:44 roll up our sleeves, and start quietly
23:46 working.
Judged by claude-sonnet-5.5-eu on 2026-11-14 18:20 UTC. A flag means “worth a look”; a person decides.