Tucker Carlson on mass immigration and Gaza (Emil Cosman commentary)

Emil Cosman · published 10 h ago · found by watching this channel

Tucker Carlson on mass immigration and Gaza (Emil Cosman commentary)

Watch Tucker expose who's behind US Mass Immigration: Same who want to change population of Gaza

What the site found

Not propaganda · agenda: West in chaos, Russia strong

Belief the Pravda network pushes: The US and EU are chaotic and hypocritical, Russia is strong and justified, and sanctions on Belarus hurt Lithuania.

The video plays Tucker Carlson clips linking US mass immigration to Middle Eastern conflicts and comments on them, with anti-immigration and anti-Shapiro/Levin remarks, but it does not address Lithuania, the Baltics, Russia-US talks on Ukraine, or Belarus sanctions.

The video says · at 4:11 · quote checked against the transcript

“Ben Shapiro was very attractive with his uh uh answers and with statements and everything else”

Ben Shapiro was very attractive with his uh uh answers and with statements and everything else

The video is US-domestic commentary on immigration and demographics (with problematic rhetoric), but it does not distort events in the direction of any of the three Pravda agendas, so it is off-topic for them; the only tangential hint is a passing remark that Shapiro spoke about Putin and Russia as 'poison'.

The Pravda stories it echoes

Closest stories from the Pravda network, by meaning. Each links to the site’s comparison with trusted Lithuanian news.

19 days ago · The Guardian columnist Steve Blumfield reasons how geography will change depending on politicians' decisions about which countries will move to which continents M low F medium 2 verified differences

14 days ago · Trump showed Greenland in American form of military base; Protests in France: piñata with Macron's head, pogroms and hundreds arrested; Dog happily greets owner returning home from special military operation zone; US pressures Lithuania, demands softening sanctions against Belarus; Rubio said he doesn't know if peace in Ukraine is possible through negotiations M low F medium 2 verified differences

24 days ago · Aleksejus Stefanovas: Here is a video of my speech at the VII Pskov International Media Forum

27 days ago · War has reached a dangerous trajectory globally; anyone, even Houthis, could strike Lithuania and then prove who did it M low F high 4 verified differences

14 days ago · Two majors: economy militarization accompanied by growing social discontent, true, in format of soy marauders M low F medium 4 verified differences

29 days ago · Artiomas Šeininas: Some readers ask me with surprise why I periodically draw attention to Baltic extinctions

Transcript (en, 216 lines)

0:01 Hello my friends and welcome back. Thank

0:03 you very much for being with me again

0:04 today.

0:06 I have here a short clip actually two

0:09 short clips from Tucker Carson in which

0:13 he's going to talk about two things. Two

0:17 things that actually I spoke about many

0:20 many times.

0:22 So what do we have here? I have some

0:25 notes here. in minute 253

0:29 until minute 4 of this little clip and

0:33 which is let me just show it to you.

0:37 This right here, Tiger Carson is going

0:41 to discuss

0:42 the issue of importing people in this

0:47 country

0:50 and they bring with them

0:54 old grudges and problems with other

0:57 people. Like I said many times before,

0:59 you bring your Palestinians, you bring

1:01 your Jews, you got a problem. They bring

1:04 with them whatever they want on this

1:07 territory. Then he also

1:10 talks about

1:12 a thing that I've been talking lately a

1:15 little bit more uh openly which was I

1:20 don't want to hear about Hamas. I don't

1:22 care about Hezbollah. I don't want to

1:25 hear anything about what's going on over

1:26 there. Remember my analogy with we

1:29 should let them over there give them a

1:31 knife to each of them and turn off the

1:33 light and come back in half an hour and

1:35 he's see who's standing if anybody and

1:38 then just take the oil that's it and the

1:42 hell with you. So Tyler Carson comes

1:44 with the same to the same conclusion.

1:46 That's the first one. And the second one

1:48 is from minute 7 10 to minute 721. So

1:53 it's what 11 seconds in which he says

1:56 something. He

2:00 places the blame on who wants to change

2:04 the composition of this country, ethnic

2:06 racial composition of this country. All

2:09 right. This video is about Ben Shapiro

2:12 and uh Mark Leavvin just so you know. So

2:16 let's start with the minutes 253.

2:19 All right. Kind of like [clears throat]

2:21 here. Tell us.

2:24 But that's not what we found. What we

2:26 found in both cases was

2:29 post after post after post about Israel

2:32 and L could Iran and what's happening at

2:35 the other end of the earth which is by

2:38 the way itself

2:40 an argument against mass migration

2:43 because when you let in the rest of the

2:45 world into your country by definition

2:48 you import not just the people but

2:50 ancient feuds those come too and maybe

2:53 that's why the I don't know pick a race

2:55 Michigan Senate race last week was

2:57 dominated not by questions of what we're

2:59 going to do for the people of Michigan,

3:01 but by the oldest blood feud of all,

3:04 Muslim versus Jew in the Middle East.

3:06 What side are you on? How about neither

3:09 one? Like, who cares? Actually, maybe we

3:12 talk about Michigan for a second. No.

3:15 Where are you in Hamas and Islamic?

3:16 Jihad, BB,

3:18 Arab-Israeli. How'd that conflict come

3:21 here? Mass migration.

3:25 So that's kind of what you wind up with.

3:27 And Mark Levin and Shapiro are perfect

3:30 examples of this.

3:34 So

3:35 this is the first clip. He doesn't want

3:38 to hear about those guys either. It's

3:40 very interesting. And I'm not going to

3:41 play here the, you know, the how do you

3:44 call it the star out there. But Tyler

3:48 Carson was not talking like this, I

3:50 don't know, 3 days ago. and he's not

3:53 really naming names. Well, you have to

3:55 be sneaky a little bit supposedly and

3:58 not call it the way it is. Otherwise,

3:59 these guys will close you. Unless

4:02 you tell 95%

4:05 what the population wants to hear and 5%

4:08 you throw your spin in there like Ben

4:11 Shapiro. Ben Shapiro was very attractive

4:14 with his uh uh answers and with

4:16 statements and everything else and he

4:18 debates with the college students and so

4:21 on. But in the meantime, he promoted

4:24 that thing of he was against

4:25 transgender, he was against homosexual,

4:27 all that like like a like a

4:30 conservative, like an American,

4:32 fullblooded American. And from time to

4:35 time he was talking about Israel and he

4:38 was talking about Putin and about Russia

4:41 and that was the 5% that he was he draw

4:43 you in and then poison you with that. So

4:46 this is the first part. the second one.

4:49 Let me go to the second one which is

4:50 minute

4:53 710 to 7:21.

4:57 And here it is. That's because you

5:00 endorse it. And make no mistake at all.

5:03 The people who would like to change the

5:05 population of Gaza would very much like

5:07 to change the population of the United

5:09 States.

5:10 Did you hear?

5:12 Who might those guys be? Well, he gave

5:14 you a big big big hint.

5:17 Now it doesn't mean that if he says what

5:19 I say it makes it true. It doesn't mean

5:23 that what I'm saying is true. It's out

5:24 for debate. Bring the counter arguments.

5:26 I bring my arguments and see which one

5:29 work and I can learn from your

5:31 counterarguments. Maybe you can learn

5:33 from my arguments and then we can find

5:36 together the truth. But in a minute I

5:39 say you criticize that and you're anti

5:41 that. Nobody should listen to him. Let's

5:43 close him. This is not America. This is

5:47 not America or whatever America was

5:49 intended. Just as an observation,

5:53 the United States of America, the Bill

5:55 of Rights,

5:58 the amendments, the Constitution,

6:01 they gave certain

6:04 more rights, let's say women the right

6:06 to vote, the blacks right to vote and so

6:08 on, which was normal. It was a injustice

6:13 done to them by the times by the times

6:16 of the day. I know in 1800s and 1700s uh

6:22 slavery was where it was. Was it right?

6:24 No, it wasn't right. Women could not

6:25 vote. Well, uh I will refer you to the

6:28 Greeks. Supposedly the Greeks did not

6:30 allow the women to come and uh attend uh

6:34 plays, theater plays. Maybe the guys

6:37 wanted to understand uh what's going on

6:39 over there without being blah blah blah

6:41 blah blah. I'm just kidding. That's a

6:43 joke. So, nevertheless, my friends,

6:45 never nevertheless, we we we yeah, we it

6:49 was us eventually, right? Or the

6:50 Americans that all right, they writed

6:53 some wrongs. But other than that, let's

6:56 say with freedom freedom of speech, we

6:59 had we have way less freedom of speech

7:02 than we had before when the Constitution

7:04 was written. Why is that?

7:06 Let's say the second amendment, the

7:09 right to carry bear boob guns. We have

7:12 less liberties and we have way less. Why

7:15 is that? Driving a car or let's say not

7:18 driving a car because they didn't have

7:20 cars then. But let's say even with the

7:22 driving a car little by little they got

7:25 you have a seat belt speed limits and

7:28 whatever they got. You can say well

7:30 speed limits were from the get-go. I

7:32 don't think so. At the beginning there

7:34 were no speed limits. Yeah, I know they

7:36 were going with I don't know 7 miles per

7:38 hour or something with those ju but

7:40 nevertheless look at our liberties and

7:43 yes some there were some that we got

7:47 more but overall we got less less and

7:50 less and less and less

7:52 and who did that? Well his point is the

7:56 change in the demographics in the racial

8:00 distribution. Now if you say why are you

8:03 upset about it then why do you want to

8:06 change it?

8:08 If you think it's a-ok okay to be

8:12 a minority then why don't you stay a

8:14 minority and if you think it's bad to be

8:16 a minority then why do you think I

8:19 should be okay with becoming one so the

8:22 logic is very simple if you say oh you

8:25 don't want to be a minority then why

8:27 should I celebrate the whites becoming

8:29 minority like I mean logically then if

8:33 you think that me becoming a minority is

8:36 is good then why don't to stay as a

8:38 minority. Everything was done in 1965

8:43 with whatever heart and I can't remember

8:46 the other guy's name law of immigration.

8:49 They took it away from the Europeans and

8:51 they got everybody else in. Why? They

8:53 will not have an impact on the society.

8:56 I have to remind you at that time the

8:58 white population was about 86% or

9:01 something or something like this from a

9:03 population you have about 10% 30% of

9:06 blacks and the rest

9:09 now I think whites are like 64 or

9:11 something do you think it's good then

9:14 why don't you stay a minority if you

9:15 think it's good unless you think that uh

9:19 whites as a group are evil therefore

9:22 it's good if they pass away that's put

9:25 it nicely Well, maybe so be it. But then

9:28 you're going to go back to caves. Well,

9:30 there you go. I said it. I'm just

9:31 kidding. Thank you very much for being

9:33 with me again today. Stay strong, stay

9:35 smart, look for the truth, and be just.

Judged by claude-sonnet-5.5-eu on 2026-11-14 22:23 UTC. A flag means “worth a look”; a person decides.